• Article | 5.26.21
    The Texas legislature has passed House Bill 19, a law that will impact lawsuits involving commercial motor vehicles commenced after September 1, 2021. The bill is aimed at controlling what are seen as abusive lawsuits against commercial motor vehicle operators by providing owners and operators an important option of seeking to bifurcate the trial of certain claims involving bodily injury or death involving a commercial motor vehicle. The bill follows a 118% increase in the number of lawsuits involving commercial motor vehicle crashes in Texas over the past eighteen years and dramatic increases in insurance premiums for both large and small commercial motor carriers in recent years. While the bill was originally aimed at providing far more protections for the industry as whole, the current version nevertheless provides critical new procedures all motor carrier operators and their counsel need to consider going forward.
  • Case Updates | 5.17.21
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit considered the question of whether, under Pennsylvania law, a plaintiff's Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (UTPCPL) claim against a builder who constructed her home was barred by the economic loss doctrine. The UTPCPL prohibits, "unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce." 73 Pa. Cons. Stat. §201-3. The Third Circuit found that the economic loss doctrine could not be utilized to bar claims under the UTPCPL in Pennsylvania. The economic loss doctrine stands for the general proposition that a party cannot recover purely economic losses in a tort as a result of failed contractual expectations.
  • Case Updates | 5.3.21
    One of the toughest challenges coverage counsel and carriers face is trying to figure out how much breadth should be given to a decision that a California Court of Appeal has actually decided to publish. That difficulty is compounded when the potential impact of the decision requires extrapolation based upon a series of hypotheticals. Under California law, the typical bad faith claim for a failure to settle occurs when: (1) a third party claimant makes a reasonable settlement offer within the policy’s limits; (2) the carrier rejects the offer; (3) the matter proceeds to trial, and (4) the trial results in a judgment against the insured for an amount greater than the policy’s limits. Under such circumstances, the carrier becomes liable for the entire judgment.
  • Case Updates | 4.13.21
    On April 7, 2021, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals delivered a victory for businesses and retailers who have faced growing numbers of lawsuits alleging their websites violated Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") because they are not accessible to those who are vision-impaired. In so doing, the Eleventh Circuit reversed a bench trial verdict obtained by a plaintiff in the Southern District of Florida. This decision could be "felt" beyond the Eleventh Circuit as it contradicts with decisions from other federal circuits, making this issue now potentially ripe for intervention from the United States Supreme Court, which just passed on addressing this issue a few years ago.
  • Case Updates | 3.30.21
    North Carolina law is well established that architects and engineers owe a duty of care to those who reasonably rely on their work. This duty runs in favor of a builder regardless of whether there is a contract with the design professional. North Carolina law is equally well established that an unlicensed contractor is barred from enforcing certain remedies under the “licensure defense.” The licensure defense is a court-created doctrine seeking to incentivize compliance with statutory licensure requirements and to protect the public from incompetent builders. These two maxims of North Carolina construction law collided in a recent North Carolina Court of Appeals case, Wright Constr. Servs., Inc. v. Hard Art Studio, PLLC, No. COA19-1089, 2020 WL 7906704 (N.C. App. Dec. 31, 2020).
  • Article | 3.29.21
    On March 10, 2021, President Biden signed into law the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (“ARPA” or “the Act”). Included in the Act are three major takeaways for employers that impact both small and large workplaces: (1) Tax credits for voluntarily extending and expanding paid leave under the FFCRA; (2) Employer-paid COBRA subsidies for six months; and (3) Additional unemployment insurance benefits. Employers must understand and act upon these new rules and regulations and update their policies and practices accordingly. For employers that do business in California, Governor Newsom also signed Senate Bill (SB) 95 into law on March 19, 2021, creating Labor Code section 248.2, which extends and expands requirements for employers to provide supplemental paid sick leave to employees affected by Covid-19.
  • Trial Results | 3.24.21
    On March 3, 2021, the Los Angeles County Superior Court granted Underwriters’ motion for summary judgment in a $3.5 million bad faith lawsuit. Underwriters were represented by WSHB’s insurance coverage team of Tracy Lewis and Ricky Zelonka. The case stemmed from an insurance coverage dispute arising out of a fire to residential real property in Hawaii in the summer of 2017. The Hawaii property was covered under a lender placed program issued to an international property management company. After Underwriters received the claim, the Company filed for bankruptcy and it was discovered that they engaged in a multi-year $1 billion Ponzi scheme. While Underwriters were adjusting the claim and considering the impact of the pending bankruptcy, the Company filed a bad faith lawsuit in California state court. Underwriters’ defense to the lawsuit was that the Policy was void ab initio due to the Company's concealment of the true nature of its business and representing itself as a commercial lender when it procured the Policy.
  • Newsroom | 3.23.21

    Last week we witnessed a horrible act of violence in Atlanta in which 8 people, among them 6 Asian American women, were brutally killed by a lone gunman. While this event caught the attention of many Americans, sadly, it follows a succession of brazen acts of violence and many racist actions against Asian Americans in the past several years.

    From its beginning, WSHB has been built on a policy of zero tolerance for discrimination and prejudice against any group of people based on race, ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation. As a firm, we are repulsed by these acts of violence and discrimination against Asian Americans and stand in full support and solidarity with them.

  • Newsroom | 3.10.21

    The recent winter storms and devastation in Texas have drawn closer attention to a case that has made its way to the Texas Supreme Court. Texas’ primary power grid operator, Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), faces a lawsuit that could determine future legal liability in this context.

    In 2016, Panda Power Funds alleged that ERCOT improperly manipulated projections of the state’s power needs. Relying on these projections, Panda Power constructed three power plants to meet the state’s need. When the demand did not materialize, Panda Power lost more than $2 billion and filed suit against ERCOT. In response, ERCOT claims sovereign immunity shields it from liability. ERCOT is a private company, however, it is also overseen by the state, and sovereign immunity protects governmental bodies from certain liability.

  • Case Updates | 1.27.21
    On January 6, 2021, the Department of Labor ("DOL") announced a final rule aimed at trying to clarify the standard for determining whether someone is an "employee" or "independent contractor" under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"). Absent any change in direction from the new Biden administration, the rule would go into effect on March 8, 2021 and would amend 29 CFR Chapter V by adding sections 795.100 through 795.110. In setting forth this new rule, the DOL aimed to provide less uncertainty in application of this test, especially in light of the novel issues raised by app-based, gig economy workers, among others. It is likely no coincidence that this new rule was promulgated on the heels of the passage of Proposition 22 in California, a ballot initiative that excepted app-based transportation and delivery companies from other laws that would have required these companies to classify their drivers as "employees" as opposed to "independent contractors."
  • Trial Results | 1.25.21

    WSHB’s elite national trial team obtained a defense verdict from a jury in Orange County, California, on behalf of a property management company that specializes in community associations. The defendant was accused of wrongfully terminating an 11-year tenured employee while he was out on medical leave for treatment of Stage 4 cancer.

    This trial, the team’s second case taken to verdict during the Covid-19 pandemic, was conducted under less than ideal circumstances with social distancing being enforced by spreading jurors throughout the courtroom, impacting sight lines to witnesses and exhibits, and everyone being required to wear masks, which made both hearing and judging credibility difficult. Through extra effort, strategizing, planning and physical positioning during different phases of the trial, WSHB’s trial team was able to navigate the new difficulties created by the distancing requirements.

  • Case Updates | 1.22.21
    On January 21, 2021, the Florida Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the long-standing principle in Florida that extra-contractual and consequential damages are not available to an insured who has not brought a "bad faith" action against their insurer. Instead, when an insured has only alleged that an insured has breached the terms of the policy, the insured is only entitled to recover the "amount owed pursuant to the express terms and conditions of the policy." As a consequence of its decision, the Supreme Court rejected the lower appellate court's finding that an insured could seek "consequential damages" for its lost rents even when the policy did not provide coverage for lost rental income so long as such those damages were "contemplated" or foreseen at the time the policy was issued.
  • Newsroom | 1.5.21

    California Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara has implemented a one-year moratorium on carriers non-renewing or cancelling residential property insurance policies resulting from the 2020 wildfires in areas within or adjacent to a fire perimeter after a declared state of emergency is issued by the Governor. On December 31, 2020, Commissioner Lara released the final ZIP codes protected from non-renewals for the 2020 wildfires. In total, 2.4 million policyholders and 563 ZIP codes are covered under the moratorium.

    The moratorium was enacted “to address the long-term threats to Californians.” Commissioner Lara pledged to “continue to work with local communities and state leaders to ensure a healthy insurance market for everyone.”

  • Article | 12.31.20
    On December 21, 2020, Congress approved the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 ("CAA"). The CAA was signed into law on December 27, 2020, effectively extending certain pandemic stimulus benefits into 2021, four days before benefits were set to expire. However, the CAA does not extend all pandemic benefits. This article highlights the CAA provision extending benefits under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act ("FFCRA") at the federal and select state levels.
  • Coronavirus Resources | 10.23.20

    A Superior Court Judge in Durham County, North Carolina recently ruled in favor of a number of restaurants in their collective action against Cincinnati Insurance for loss of business income due to the Covid-19 pandemic in a case captioned North State Deli, LLC, et al. v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company, et al., Case No. 20-CVS-02569.

    In a departure from courts across the country, the presiding judge held that government orders restricting the policyholders’ use of their restaurants constituted “direct physical loss” thus triggering the policies’ Business Income coverage. The court reasoned that the phrase “direct physical loss” “includes the inability to utilize or possess something in the real, material, or bodily world, resulting from a given cause with the intervention of other conditions” and therefore “describes the scenario where business owners…lose the full range of rights and advantages of using or accessing their business property.”

  • Newsroom | 10.14.20
  • Newsroom | 10.13.20

    On October 1, 2020, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed three bills sponsored by the California Department of Insurance and Commissioner Ricardo Lara to enable future wildfire survivors to recover faster and protect the rights of domestic workers during an emergency.

    Senate Bill 872 was introduced on January 21, 2020 by Senator Bill Dodd. The new law will expand the definition of additional living expenses that must be paid to homeowners for losses incurred in a state of emergency and require an advance payment of no less than four months for costs such as housing, furniture rental and transportation. The new law will also mandate an advance payment of no less than 25 percent of the policy limit for lost contents without submission of an inventory form and require insurers to provide homeowners a 60-day grace period for payment of residential premium after an emergency. Additionally, insurers will be barred from deducting the land value from payouts for insureds who build on new lots.

  • Newsroom | 10.2.20

    WSHB is proud to announce the opening of its newest location in Charleston, South Carolina.

    At the helm of WSHB's newest location will be WSHB partner William W. Silverman. Admitted to practice in both South Carolina and North Carolina, Silverman enjoys a well-deserved reputation for consistent results in complex commercial litigation. His varied practice includes the defense of construction and corporate disputes, insurance coverage, first and third party insurance bad faith litigation, environmental, and catastrophic injury matters. He is an “AV Preeminent” rated attorney by Martindale-Hubbell, and has been listed in Business North Carolina’s Legal Elite in the Young Guns and Construction categories.

  • Newsroom | 10.2.20

    WSHB is proud to announce the opening of its newest location in Boston, Massachusetts. The firm’s Boston location will provide the firm’s full array of nationwide legal services in both litigated and non-litigated practice areas.

    WSHB Partner Christopher J. Seusing has been selected as the managing partner for the firm's newest location. Seusing called Massachusetts home for many years, first as he earned his undergraduate degree, cum laude, from Stonehill College in Easton, MA, and then as he went on to earn his law degree, cum laude, at Suffolk University in downtown Boston. He honed his litigation skills practicing throughout Massachusetts following his graduation from Suffolk.

  • Newsroom | 9.21.20
    WSHB proudly announces our firm’s number seven ranking on the National Law Journal’s (NLJ) Women in Law Scorecard for 2020. The Women in Law Scorecard ranks the United States’ largest law firms by representation of women attorneys. Scorecard rankings are calculated by adding each firm’s percentage of total women lawyers with the percentage of partners who are women.
  • Newsroom | 9.8.20

    The California Insurance Commissioner has now issued emergency notices to all admitted and non-admitted property and casualty insurance companies doing business in California to assist survivors, displaced residents, and businesses impacted by the current and recent wildfires throughout the state. The emergency order was issued in connection with Governor Gavin Newsom’s August 18, 2020 emergency declaration that was issued due to the wildfires.

    Lara stated that “[w]ildfire survivors need immediate help as they start on the long road to recovery” and “urge[d] insurance companies to do the right thing for these survivors and help them through this difficult process.” Specifically, Lara implored all property and casualty carriers to implement expedited claims handling procedures and billing grace periods to aid the quick recovery of residents and businesses during the emergency.

  • Newsroom | 8.26.20
    On August 20, 2020, California Department of Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara issued a release advising wildfire evacuees to keep all receipts for costs accrued, as they may be eligible for reimbursement from their homeowners or renters insurance company. Specifically, Commissioner Lara remarked that “additional living expense coverage can be available to help ease the financial burden of mandatory evacuations.” His release expressly advised homeowners that additional living expense coverage (“ALE”) can include food and housing costs, furniture rental, relocation and storage, as well as extra transportation expenses, even when homes are not damaged or destroyed.
  • Article | 8.26.20
    On August 3, 2020, the Southern District of New York (Judge J. Paul Oekten) broadened the scope of paid sick leave for employees seeking relief under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”). The Court expanded employee benefits by vacating several features of the U.S. Department of Labor’s (“DOL”) Final Rule regarding administration of the FFCRA. The expanded benefits come at an opportune time with a second wave of crisis looming and families facing massive uncertainty with schools reopening. The DOL will likely appeal this ruling to the Second Circuit. The Second Circuit may reinstate the vacated features from the Final Rule pending review, but until then, the significance of this ruling cannot be ignored by New York employers, which may be risking non-compliance, liabilities and penalties. Further, employers should anticipate and prepare for more employees to request paid leave pursuant to the expanded benefits under this decision.
  • Case Updates | 8.21.20
    In a much anticipated decision, California’s highest court held this week that a statutory penalty of $500 for Patients’ Bill of Rights violation claims brought by residents of skilled nursing and intermediate care facilities will be capped at $500 per cause of action, rather than by each individual regulatory violation. In doing so, the high court reversed the underlying decision which involved an award of the statutory penalty to each of 382 alleged separate violations. This decision is highly favorable to the skilled nursing industry given that an affirmative ruling would have likely resulted in a new influx of litigation and would have increased the potential exposure.
  • Newsroom | 8.20.20
    We are pleased to announce that 18 WSHB lawyers have been included in the 2021 Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch, which recognizes associates and other lawyers who are earlier in their careers for their outstanding professional excellence in private practice in the United States. Lawyers recognized in Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch are divided by geographic region and practice areas. They are reviewed by their peers on the basis of professional expertise, and undergo an authentication process to make sure they are in current practice and in good standing.
  • Newsroom | 8.20.20
    WSHB  is pleased to announce that 5 lawyers have been included in the 2021 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America. Since it was first published in 1983, Best Lawyers has become universally regarded as the definitive guide to legal excellence. Lawyers on The Best Lawyers in America list are divided by geographic region and practice areas. They are reviewed by their peers on the basis of professional expertise, and undergo an authentication process to make sure they are in current practice and in good standing.
  • Newsroom | 8.6.20
    On August 5, 2020 during a special session of the Nevada Legislature SB4 was passed and is expected to be signed by the Governor in the coming days. This bill grants broad liability protections to businesses including for profit, governmental entities and private non-profit organizations creating immunity from civil liability for personal injury or death resulting from exposure to Covid-19, if the business, governmental entity or private nonprofit organization substantially complied with controlling health standards. Notably hospitals and other health care facilities as well as school districts are exempted from receiving the additional protections afforded by this bill.
  • Article | 8.3.20
    On July 21, 2020, the New York State Department of Financial Services filed charges against First American Title Insurance Company, regarding violations of NYSDFS’s Cybersecurity Regulations for Financial Services Companies. These are the first charges to be filed by NYSDFS’ Consumer Protection and Financial Enforcement Section alleging violations of the Cybersecurity Regulation enacted in 2017, and portend active enforcement to come. As the Cybersecurity Regulation applies to all institutions and professionals regulated by the NYSDFS, this inaugural enforcement action should be a wake-up call to insurance companies, financial institutions and other professionals doing business in New York.
  • Newsroom | 7.24.20

    Covid-19 related restrictions have lifted across the United States (and in some instances then imposed again). With businesses reopening physical locations and the prospect of schools holding in-person classes this fall, owners, board members, executives and managers all must address potential coronavirus related liabilities. Any owner or operator of a facility where in-person contact occurs is at risk for civil suits and claims for potentially exposing employees, customers or other members of the public to the coronavirus.

    In response to these risks, businesses and other institutions have asked employees, customers, and patrons to sign liability waivers. Examples include President Trump’s reelection campaign asking supporters to execute liability waivers before attending rallies. This practice has gained significant media attention and has led many to wonder whether these waivers are enforceable.

  • Article | 7.23.20

    Insurers investigating claims in Colorado should be aware of new limits on their ability to assert a failure-to-cooperate defense in litigation. Effective September 15, 2020, C.R.S. § 10-3-1118 imposes a number of hurdles on insurers seeking to argue that coverage is not available because an insured did not cooperate in the investigation of a claim.

    Before an insurer can assert a failure-to-cooperate defense in first-party actions, the statute requires compliance with several conditions. First, the insurer must request information from the insured or their representative in writing, via certified mail or electronic means, if the insured or their representative have consented to receive electronic documents from the insurer.

  • Newsroom | 7.15.20
    On July 2, 2020, California Assembly Bill 1552 was amended and referred to the California Senate Insurance Committee. The bill is intended to regulate commercial business interruption coverage of insured businesses in light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The bill is an “urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety . . . and shall go into immediate effect.” The immediacy of the bill is intended “to protect the solvency of businesses that were forced to close their doors or limit business” due to the pandemic. The bill, if passed, would apply retroactively to all commercial insurance policies providing coverage for business interruption that were in full force and effect on and after March 4, 2020 (the date of the declared state of emergency).
  • Newsroom | 6.26.20

    National law firm WSHB is proud to announce the opening of their newest location in Sonoma County, California. Situated in the heart of Northern California’s wine country, the firm’s Sonoma County office provides the firm’s full array of nationwide legal services in both litigated and non-litigated practice areas.

    Partner Steven J. Disharoon will be at the helm of this new location. A ten year veteran of the firm, Disharoon relocated from the firm’s Northern California office in Concord to serve as managing partner in Sonoma County. A vastly experienced trial and appellate attorney, Disharoon specializes in complex civil litigation, intellectual property, and transportation, as well as environmental claims and natural disasters. Outside the courtroom, he is an equally skilled negotiator of complex and contentious cases, who also provides his services for transactional and other non-litigated matters.

  • Newsroom | 6.23.20

    WSHB is proud to announce our top three national ranking on The American Lawyer’s 2020 Diversity Scorecard.

    American Lawyer’s Diversity Scorecard records the average number of full-time-equivalent minority attorneys at Am Law 200 and National Law Journal 250 law firms in the calendar year 2019.

    WSHB jumped 23 places from their ranking in the previous year, landing on their current spot at no. 3 on this year’s list.

  • Newsroom | 6.22.20

    WSHB partner Kimberly Jones was recently elected to the position of Chair-Elect of the Florida Bar's Appellate Practice Section.

    This 1,500-person organization is devoted to promoting excellence in Florida's state and federal appellate courts. Its members include lawyers from a wide spectrum of appellate practice areas and judicial representatives from each of Florida's appellate courts. The Section produces several publications on appellate issues, teaches many legal education seminars, and is at the forefront of providing pro bono appellate services to Florida litigants.

  • Trial Results | 6.17.20

    In a landmark decision, the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled on the critical issue of failing to preserve evidence and created an important carve out to the prior case law on this important evidentiary issue. This closely watched decision has been the subject of much discussion.

    “In many instances, a business’ failure to maintain or preserve evidence can be fatal to the defense of a hotly contested action,” said WSHB Partner Andrew Kessler, who handled the appeal on behalf of the prevailing party. Kessler, managing partner of the WSHB Pennsylvania office believes that, “This case gives rise to development of a strong defense in those instances where evidence is inadvertently destroyed and removes the presumption that the party who destroyed the evidence did so because it was unfavorable to them. Avoiding the thought is a juror’s head that “they got rid of the evidence” can be vital in these types of cases where these issues arise. Avoiding the presumption helps to keep the playing field level.”

  • Coronavirus Resources | 6.15.20

    Much like the global impact from Covid-19 not all occurrences can be foreseen. This is why many contracts contain a provision known as a force majeure clause. Force majeure clauses are especially important in times like these – when businesses are shutting down, the government is ordering the labor force to stay home, and supply chains are interrupted or non-existent.

    The question many in the construction industry and beyond are asking is whether the Covid-19 pandemic excuses performance under a contract. As usual when it comes to the law, it depends.

  • Publications | 6.9.20

    WSHB Partner Constance Endelicato was quoted in the June 8, 2020 Skilled Nursing News article, "Nursing Homes Face Fines, Lawsuits Unless They Test for Covid-19 — But Access Often Out of Their Hands"

    In this article, Ms. Endelicato wrote: 

    “Testing capability is riddled with a number of factors that often are out of the hands of the nursing facility,” Constance Endelicato, a partner at the law firm Wood, Smith Henning & Berman who represents health care providers that include SNFs, wrote to Skilled Nursing News in an e-mail on June 3. “The facilities face the daunting task of attempting to abide by the governing recommendations, keeping in mind that with the exception of New York, recommendations will not necessarily define the standard of care under the pandemic crisis. We need to remember that the entire medical community was not prepared for this unknown and eerily unpredictable virus.”

  • Case Updates | 6.5.20
    In California, under a rule premised on the theory of ostensible agency, a hospital may be liable for the negligence of physicians on the staff, even when such physicians are in fact independent contractors, unless the hospital has clearly notified the patient that the treating physicians are not hospital employees and there is no reason to believe the patient was unable to understand or act on the information. The required elements of ostensible agency are: "(1) conduct by the hospital that would cause a reasonable person to believe that there was an agency relationship and (2) reliance on that apparent agency relationship by the plaintiff." (Mejia v. Community Hospital of San Bernardino (2002) 99 Cal.App.4th 1448, 1457.) On June 1, 2020, the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, decided the case of Wicks, et al. v. Antelope Valley Healthcare District. The court held, among other holdings, that the evidence established in the case conclusively established that the emergency room physicians were not the ostensible agents of the hospital as a matter of law.
  • Appellate Results | 6.4.20

    Attorneys Kelly Waters, Jill Mucerino, and Sam John of WSHB's New Jersey office recently secured several appellate rulings enforcing arbitration clauses in favor of WSHB's clients. In one case the New Jersey Appellate Division reversed the Trial Court's denial of our motion to compel arbitration. In two separate matters that were consolidated on appeal, a different panel of the Appellate Division affirmed the Trial Court's grants of our motions to compel arbitration.

  • Article | 5.27.20
    Covid-19 forces employers to make difficult and often times unprecedented decisions as businesses in nearly all industries face falling revenue and inconsistent governmental restrictions. The resulting decisions regarding human resources practices and policies exposes thousands of employers to existing and emerging liabilities, adding to the impact of the pandemic.
  • Publications | 5.27.20
    The Covid-19 pandemic has impacted every corporation in every sector of the economy. Hard decisions must be made in regard to workplace safety, layoffs and furloughs, investments, financing and business planning. Challenges to corporate governance will follow. These suits may be retrospective, focusing on alleged failures in regard to disaster preparedness, insurance coverage and contingency planning or prospective, challenging ongoing management, financial and operational decisions. As the economic crisis caused by shelter-in-place and social distancing orders grows, corporations will be faced with selling assets, entering into mergers or financing agreements that would have been unthinkable prior to the pandemic. Shareholder suits are sure to follow.
  • Newsroom | 5.20.20
    The Covid-19 Pandemic is a singular event. There is no analogous historical precedent. The impact of this disease and the social distancing measures taken to address it have had both local and international effects. The economic impact has been immediate and sharp. Unlike past recessions, the halt in economic activity was precipitous and driven not by a financial crisis, commodities shortages or inflation, but by public health measures. This makes projections risky, as precedents are few and inexact.But we are now far enough into the Pandemic and the response to it that we can begin to see trends. Our views are shaped by experience in past economic downturns and knowledge of the industries in the areas in which we practice. This series of articles present our views on how multiple practice areas will be impacted as Courts return to operation and the pace of litigation returns to normal.
  • Newsroom | 5.19.20

    Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP is pleased to announce that Vincent P. Beilman III has been elected WSHB’s London Market Chair.

    Vince Beilman enjoys international acclaim for his savvy counsel to various syndicates throughout the London market. From his early years where he was a secondee to later on where he developed a reputation as the "go to" lawyer for all matters of issue in the States, Beilman has an impressive record of consistent results.

    "I am fortunate to have so many close relationships in the London market, professionally and personally," said Beilman. From the time I was a secondee to now, London is home. I look forward to the time when I will be able to sit down in person with our friends on the other side of the pond."

  • Publications | 5.6.20

    WSHB Partner Constance Endelicato was quoted in the May 4, 2020 Insurance Journal article, "Nursing Home Insurance Market In Need of Care."

    In the article, Ms. Endelicato described the COVID-19 exposures as “endless,” and said the facilities’ vulnerability to exposure has been “riddled with various complicating factors.”

    “The lack of testing capability, the delayed symptoms, the ongoing admission of new residents, and the residents’ fundamental rights to have family and friends as visitors, may also play a role in exposure as these factors are thought to be ways in which the virus can spread,” said Ms. Endelicato.

  • Publications | 4.23.20
    On Tuesday, April 14, 2020, Governor Murphy announced that he signed S-2333/A-3910, which is effective immediately and retroactive to March 9, 2020. S-2333/A-3910 provides immunity to healthcare facilities and professionals from civil and criminal claims resulting from injury or death in treating COVID-19 patients. Under the bill, a "healthcare professional" includes physicians, physician assistants, advanced practice nurses, registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, or other healthcare professionals who are authorized to provide health care services in New Jersey, as well as, EMTs or mobile intensive care paramedics who are "certified by the Commission of Health pursuant to Title 26 of the Revised Statutes or is otherwise authorized to provide health care services in the state."
  • Publications | 4.21.20
    Recent studies are now starting to show that the COVID-19 virus is, on average, trending slightly downward in the United States. It is becoming clear that the safety measures put in place throughout our country are at least starting to work. As a result, the legal world may be transitioning into a different phase of pandemic management—one focused less on the measures used to improve safety, and more on the ongoing enforcement and aftermath of these measures.
  • Newsroom | 4.17.20
    Earlier this week the California Department of Insurance issued a reminder that all business interruption claims stemming from Covid-19 losses, which are expressed by policyholders must be fairly submitted by all agents and brokers, and properly investigated by all carriers. The reminder comes after the Department received numerous complaints from businesses, public officials and insureds.
  • Newsroom | 4.16.20

    New Jersey joined several other states in temporarily allowing remote notarizations during the recent coronavirus outbreak. On April 14, 2020, Governor Phil Murphy signed legislation (A-3903/S-2336) temporarily allowing notaries to conduct remote notarizations using "communication technology." The legislation takes effect immediately and expires upon the rescission of Governor Murphy's March 9, 2020 Executive Order declaring a state of emergency as the result of coronavirus.

    The remote notarizations must comply with several requirements including the following.

  • Article | 4.16.20

    Insurers writing policies of any type in Colorado should be aware of emergency regulations imposed by the Colorado Division of Insurance during the novel coronavirus pandemic. Issued on March 27, 2020, Bulletin B-5.38 is intended to allow consumers with property and casualty insurance policies to retain coverage throughout the present public health emergency.

    The Division directed all insurance companies issuing coverage to personal and commercial policyholders to make “reasonable accommodations” to prevent policyholders from losing coverage due to cancellation or non-payment of premiums.

  • Newsroom | 4.16.20
    Although health care workers have been the primary focus of anticipated litigation that will result from COVID-19, the tentacles of pandemic litigation are now starting to permeate tangential players and coverages. Presently, the insurance industry is seeing an onslaught of business interruption claims, as businesses slow down or shut down as a result of various permutations of “shelter-in-place” orders throughout the country and the world. There are early indications that, if and when carriers deny coverage for COVID-related claims, insurance agents and brokers will emerge as another “deep pocket” that businesses can target to attempt to recover COVID-19 losses. Industry insiders are speculating that insurance agents and brokers errors and omissions claims will be a part of the next wave of COVID-19 lawsuits to rock the industry. It is anticipated that claimants will generally allege that the agent or broker failed to procure appropriate coverage for a panoply of COVID-related losses.

By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy.