News & Insights
Recent Posts
Covid-19: Assessing the Legal Risk of Infectious Diseases
WSHB Employer Alert: FFCRA and DOL Regulations 4.2.20
Employment Practices Consultation & COVID-19
It’s a No-Win Situation: The Perils Facing Hospitals Due to the Coronavirus
COVID-19 Employer Alert: Summary of the CARES Act
COVID-19: New York Malpractice Law Alert
COVID-19 Employer Alert: Enactment of Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA)
WSHB Partner Robert Hellner Shares Mediation Tactics at CLM’s 2020 Annual Conference
Risk Transfer and Contractual Indemnification – Who Gets Left Holding the Bag?
Seven Habits that Define a Highly Effective Claims Team
Read the Room: Arguments that Work in Court but May Backfire at Mediation
WSHB Partner Kelly Waters Named to NJBIZ's 2020 Best Fifty Women in Business List
WSHB Names Andrew S. Kessler as Managing Partner of the Firm's Philadelphia Office
WSHB Employment Alert: California Law Banning Arbitration Agreements Temporarily on Hold
Sam McDermott on the Dos and Don’ts of Construction Project Termination
Full Disclosure! Insurer Beware: Colorado’s New Automobile Policy Disclosure Law Has Teeth!
Andrew S. Kessler Named Legal Counsel for Northeast Community Center for Behavioral Health
WSHB Elevates Ten Partners to Defined Equity Status
Eleven WSHB Attorneys Elected Into Partnership
Eighteen Attorneys Elected to WSHB Senior Counsel
Supreme Court Allows Suit Over Website Accessibility
Strategies for Defending Legionella and Mold Claims
Time Limit Demand Issues Arrive in North Carolina
WSHB Welcomes New Partner Julie A. Weerth to the Firm's New York Office
Temp Agency Absolved of Liability in Hotly Contested Action
Alternative Fee Agreements and Construction Issues: Oil and Water or Perfect Pairing!?
WSHB's Graham Miller Helps Demystify Construction Claims in the Pacific Northwest
WSHB Partner Janice Michaels Named to The Best Lawyers in America© 2020 List
One Bad Apple: Navigating through Sexual Battery and other Intentional Torts
Leading Construction Litigator Cynthia Tari Joins WSHB's Dallas Office
WSHB’s Philadelphia Partner Secures Summary Judgment in Catastrophic Premises Liability Matter
WSHB Welcomes New Partner Andrew Kessler
Renowned Litigator Jason Williams Joins WSHB's Nevada Office
Litigator Richard Young Joins WSHB's Nevada Office
17 WSHB Lawyers Honored as 2019's Rising Stars
WSHB’s Jason Klein Breaks Down the Good, the Sad and the Funny Sides of Claims
Girl on Fire: The Price of Pursuing the Truth in the #MeToo World
Pragmatic Issues on Settlement Versus Trial for Legal Malpractice Cases
WSHB Partner Jade Tran Named to Lawyers of Color's "Nation's Best" List
The Natural Progression of Natural Disasters
Nevada’s Governor Signs Chapter 40 Reform Bill
WA Condo Law Changes Hope to Curtail Frivolous Defect Lawsuits and Stimulate Production
WSHB Co-Founder Stephen Henning Steps Into the Spotlight at this Year's West Coast Casualty Seminar
Professional Liability Expert Weighs In On Protecting Your Practice From Opioid Doc Arrest Fallout
Penalties, Punitives, and Granny Cams: The Escalating Lure of Elder Abuse Litigation
Are Structured Settlements Still Relevant
Game Changing Trends Affecting Construction
He's Not My Guy: The Joint-Employer Doctrine
WSHB Case Update: DOL Proposes Increase to Minimum Salary Threshold
WSHB and DWF Announce Exclusive Association
Will Payroll Tax Credit Extensions Beget Further Paid Leave Under The FFCRA?
California Jury Returns Defense Verdict in Employment Matter Following Trial During Covid Pandemic
North Carolina State Court in Uncharted Territory in Finding Covid-19 Business Interruption Coverage
Archives
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
WSHB Case Update: DOL Proposes Increase to Minimum Salary Threshold
March 22, 2019Why This Proposal is Important
Employees in salaried positions earning under $35,308.00 annually will become newly-eligible for overtime pay if a new rule proposed by the U.S. Department of Labor is enacted. Employers with salaried positions under that amount should begin preparing to perform an audit of exemption classifications to ensure ongoing compliance in the event this rule is enacted.
The DOL Proposal
On March 7, 2019 the U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) proposed a new rule that would make an estimated 1.1 million American workers newly-eligible for overtime pay.
The Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) is a federal law which establishes, among other things, overtime pay eligibility. Within the authority granted by the FLSA, the DOL promulgates rules for determining which employees are “exempt” from, among other things, the overtime requirements.
The most common classes of employees who are considered exempt from overtime requirements under the FLSA are those who qualify for the executive exemption, the professional exemption, or the administrative exemption. These three exemptions are often referred to as the “white-collar” exemptions. While some of the criteria for the white-collar exemptions differ from one another, one requirement that all of the white-collar exemptions share is that the employee must earn at least $455.00 per week (equivalent to $23,660.00 per year), which amount was set by a DOL rule enacted in 2004.
In March 2019 the DOL proposed a new a rule which, if enacted, would raise the earnings threshold from $455.00 to $679.00 per week (equivalent to $35,308.00 annually). The newly-proposed rule would not modify the other criteria on which the determination is currently made regarding whether an employee otherwise qualifies for one of the white-collar exemptions (these additional criteria are included in the “job duties test”).
The Obama administration previously attempted to enact increases to the minimum earnings threshold, but that effort was halted by a Federal Court in Texas just before it was set to become effective in December 2016. One important distinction between the newly-proposed rule and the one that the Obama administration tried to enact relates to the issue of automatic increases. Where the Obama administration’s rule was set to increase the earnings threshold as a matter of course without additional action by the DOL, the newly-proposed rule merely contains a provision encouraging the DOL to revisit the earnings threshold every four years, with no requirement that increases occur.
Another important component of the newly-proposed rule is the modification to the definition of a “highly compensated individual.” Like those who qualify for one of the white-collar exemptions, highly compensated individuals are exempt from the overtime requirements of the FLSA. To qualify as a highly compensated individual, an employee need not meet all of the requirements of job duties test for the white-collar exemptions but must instead earn $100,000.00 or more annually. The newly-proposed rule would raise that earning threshold to $174,414.00.
The earning thresholds that are currently in place were set in 2004 at the 20th percentile of earnings for full-time, salaried workers in the lowest-wage census region. The amounts in the newly-proposed rule were calculated using the same methodology applied to 2017 census data. The Department of Labor anticipates slight changes to the final rule before enactment, updating the income thresholds with 2018 census data.
What This Means for Employers
Employers with salaried positions under $35,308.00 annually can expect to be affected by the new rule and should be prepared to adjust accordingly by considering the impact of reclassifying all employees earning less than $35,308.00 as non-exempt, including using a time clock for all hours worked, and eligibility for overtime pay and specific meal and rest periods. If enacted, the newly-proposed rule would take effect January 1, 2020.
The experienced team of employment attorneys at Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP have already begun assisting clients in understanding and preparing for compliance with this impending enactment. For more information, please contact Robert Hellner at (469) 210-2052 or at rhellner@wshblaw.com.