News & Insights

Recent Posts

WSHB Partner Kelly Waters Named to NJBIZ's 2020 Best Fifty Women in Business List

WSHB Names Andrew S. Kessler as Managing Partner of the Firm's Philadelphia Office

WSHB Employment Alert: California Law Banning Arbitration Agreements Temporarily on Hold

Sam McDermott on the Dos and Don’ts of Construction Project Termination

Full Disclosure! Insurer Beware: Colorado’s New Automobile Policy Disclosure Law Has Teeth!

Andrew S. Kessler Named Legal Counsel for Northeast Community Center for Behavioral Health

WSHB Elevates Ten Partners to Defined Equity Status

Eleven WSHB Attorneys Elected Into Partnership

Eighteen Attorneys Elected to WSHB Senior Counsel

Supreme Court Allows Suit Over Website Accessibility

Strategies for Defending Legionella and Mold Claims

Residential Revolution

Time Limit Demand Issues Arrive in North Carolina

WSHB Welcomes New Partner Julie A. Weerth to the Firm's New York Office

Temp Agency Absolved of Liability in Hotly Contested Action

Alternative Fee Agreements and Construction Issues: Oil and Water or Perfect Pairing!?

WSHB's Graham Miller Helps Demystify Construction Claims in the Pacific Northwest

WSHB Partner Janice Michaels Named to The Best Lawyers in America© 2020 List

One Bad Apple: Navigating through Sexual Battery and other Intentional Torts

Leading Construction Litigator Cynthia Tari Joins WSHB's Dallas Office

WSHB’s Philadelphia Partner Secures Summary Judgment in Catastrophic Premises Liability Matter

WSHB Welcomes New Partner Andrew Kessler

New Bill In New York Proposed for Signature by Governor Andrew Cuomo is Set To Make Employers "SWEAT"

Renowned Litigator Jason Williams Joins WSHB's Nevada Office

Litigator Richard Young Joins WSHB's Nevada Office

Published Appellate Opinion Upholding Summary Judgment in Favor of Commercial Tenant Against $3.5M Subrogation Suit

17 WSHB Lawyers Honored as 2019's Rising Stars

Arizona Supreme Court Allows Court of Appeals Decision Expanding Defendants' Ability to Enforce Settlements to Stand

WSHB’s Jason Klein Breaks Down the Good, the Sad and the Funny Sides of Claims

Litigating Sexual Battery and Other Intentional Torts: Navigating the One Bad Apple in Medical Negligence

WSHB Partner Michelle Arbitrio to Moderate Panel on Insurance and Risk Management in the Age of Mass Shootings

Girl on Fire: The Price of Pursuing the Truth in the #MeToo World

Pragmatic Issues on Settlement Versus Trial for Legal Malpractice Cases

WSHB Partner Jade Tran Named to Lawyers of Color's "Nation's Best" List

A Withering Assault

The Natural Progression of Natural Disasters

Nevada’s Governor Signs Chapter 40 Reform Bill

WA Condo Law Changes Hope to Curtail Frivolous Defect Lawsuits and Stimulate Production

WSHB Co-Founder Stephen Henning Steps Into the Spotlight at this Year's West Coast Casualty Seminar

Professional Liability Expert Weighs In On Protecting Your Practice From Opioid Doc Arrest Fallout

Penalties, Punitives, and Granny Cams: The Escalating Lure of Elder Abuse Litigation

Are Structured Settlements Still Relevant

Game Changing Trends Affecting Construction

He's Not My Guy: The Joint-Employer Doctrine

WSHB Case Update: DOL Proposes Increase to Minimum Salary Threshold

WSHB and DWF Announce Exclusive Association

WSHB Case Update: Colorado Construction Defect Legislation

February 11, 2015

Colorado Construction Defect Legislation: An Early Update on the 2015 Legislative Session

While we are only a month into the Colorado legislative session, we want to give you an update regarding the introduction of two bills and what is shaping up to be a hot button topic during this year’s legislative session: construction defect reform.


A bill introduced by State Senator Ray Scott (R-Grand Junction) — Senate Bill 15-91 (“SB 91”) — would shorten the amount of time a homeowner has to bring a legal action against a construction professional, known as the statute of repose, from eight years to four years. The current statute of repose (i.e., CRS § 13-80-104) generally requires an action against a construction professional to be brought within six years after substantial completion of an improvement to real property. However, the statute provides an additional 2 years from the date of discovery of a defect allegation to bring a lawsuit if the action arises during the fifth or sixth year after substantial completion, thus permitting up to eight years to bring a construction defect action in some circumstances.

SB 91, however, would amend the current statute and would limit the time period to bring a construction defect action to three years after substantial completion of improvement to real property. As with the current statute of repose, SB 91 would allow additional time to bring an action if the action arises during the second or third year after substantial completion. However, this exception would only allow an additional one-year (as opposed to an additional two years in the current statute) to bring an action if the action arises during the second or third year after substantial completion. Thus, SB 91 essentially cuts in half the time limitations contained in the current statute of repose, from six years to three years after substantial completion and, if the claim arises towards the end of the limitations period, from eight years to four years. We believe SB 91 would provide better protection to the construction industry and construction professionals by dramatically reducing the time in which a claimant has to bring an action against the construction professional(s). If passed, SB 91 would take effect on August 8, 2015, as long as a referendum petition is not filed against this bill. If a referendum petition is filed, the bill could be prevented from taking effect until November 2016.


A bill introduced by State Senator Jessie Ulibarri (D-Commerce City)— Senate Bill 15-79 — would increase the document-recording fee charged by each county clerk and recorder by $1 dollar. While this bill is not directly connected to reforming the current construction defect law, the new revenue would be put into a fund to be used for affordable housing. The hope is that this bill could help alleviate the shortage of affordable housing in the Denver metro area that has been argued to be the result of the current state of construction defect law in Colorado. Specifically, the argument is that the construction defect laws have had a chilling effect on the construction of condos and other affordable housing. If passed, SB 79 would take effect on July 1, 2015.


Neither of the above-referenced bills is the main construction reform bill. That bill is likely a couple months away from being introduced to the Legislature. That said, based on the bills proposed over the last two years, both of which failed, the major reform bill is likely to contain amendments to the current procedures that must be followed prior to filing a construction defect lawsuit, such as requiring increased participation and approval by members of a homeowners association prior to an association being able to file a lawsuit. The main bill may also include changes that would give builders a right to repair purported defects before legal action could be initiated, along with a provision that would require mediation prior to filing a legal action. The aim of these provisions would be to mitigate the ease of which construction defect lawsuits can be filed, which result in lengthy and expensive lawsuits, that largely benefit plaintiff trial lawyers, over problems that can often be addressed in a much less expensive, time-consuming way.

The attorneys at Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman, LLP will be following the above- referenced bills and other bills that may affect our clients very closely. Future updates will be provided as appropriate and as the current legislative session progresses. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions.


Privacy Policy      |      Site Map

© 2020 Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required