News & Insights

Recent Posts

WSHB Employer Alert: Summary of the CARES Act

New York Malpractice Law Alert

WSHB Employer Alert: Enactment of Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA)

WSHB Co-Founder Stephen Henning to Announce the Winner of CLM's 2020 Outside Counsel Professional of the Year Award

WSHB Partner Robert Hellner Shares Mediation Tactics at CLM’s 2020 Annual Conference

Risk Transfer and Contractual Indemnification – Who Gets Left Holding the Bag?

New Developments in Challenging Certificates of Merit — Seeking Dismissal for Failure to Concurrently File Certificate with the Original Petition

Seven Habits that Define a Highly Effective Claims Team

Social Media Do's and Don'ts

Read the Room: Arguments that Work in Court but May Backfire at Mediation

WSHB Partner Kelly Waters Named to NJBIZ's 2020 Best Fifty Women in Business List

WSHB Names Andrew S. Kessler as Managing Partner of the Firm's Philadelphia Office

WSHB Employment Alert: California Law Banning Arbitration Agreements Temporarily on Hold

Sam McDermott on the Dos and Don’ts of Construction Project Termination

Full Disclosure! Insurer Beware: Colorado’s New Automobile Policy Disclosure Law Has Teeth!

Andrew S. Kessler Named Legal Counsel for Northeast Community Center for Behavioral Health

WSHB Elevates Ten Partners to Defined Equity Status

Eleven WSHB Attorneys Elected Into Partnership

Eighteen Attorneys Elected to WSHB Senior Counsel

Supreme Court Allows Suit Over Website Accessibility

Strategies for Defending Legionella and Mold Claims

Residential Revolution

Time Limit Demand Issues Arrive in North Carolina

WSHB Welcomes New Partner Julie A. Weerth to the Firm's New York Office

Temp Agency Absolved of Liability in Hotly Contested Action

Alternative Fee Agreements and Construction Issues: Oil and Water or Perfect Pairing!?

WSHB's Graham Miller Helps Demystify Construction Claims in the Pacific Northwest

WSHB Partner Janice Michaels Named to The Best Lawyers in America© 2020 List

One Bad Apple: Navigating through Sexual Battery and other Intentional Torts

Leading Construction Litigator Cynthia Tari Joins WSHB's Dallas Office

WSHB’s Philadelphia Partner Secures Summary Judgment in Catastrophic Premises Liability Matter

WSHB Welcomes New Partner Andrew Kessler

New Bill In New York Proposed for Signature by Governor Andrew Cuomo is Set To Make Employers "SWEAT"

Renowned Litigator Jason Williams Joins WSHB's Nevada Office

Litigator Richard Young Joins WSHB's Nevada Office

Published Appellate Opinion Upholding Summary Judgment in Favor of Commercial Tenant Against $3.5M Subrogation Suit

17 WSHB Lawyers Honored as 2019's Rising Stars

Arizona Supreme Court Allows Court of Appeals Decision Expanding Defendants' Ability to Enforce Settlements to Stand

WSHB’s Jason Klein Breaks Down the Good, the Sad and the Funny Sides of Claims

Litigating Sexual Battery and Other Intentional Torts: Navigating the One Bad Apple in Medical Negligence

WSHB Partner Michelle Arbitrio to Moderate Panel on Insurance and Risk Management in the Age of Mass Shootings

Girl on Fire: The Price of Pursuing the Truth in the #MeToo World

Pragmatic Issues on Settlement Versus Trial for Legal Malpractice Cases

WSHB Partner Jade Tran Named to Lawyers of Color's "Nation's Best" List

A Withering Assault

The Natural Progression of Natural Disasters

Nevada’s Governor Signs Chapter 40 Reform Bill

WA Condo Law Changes Hope to Curtail Frivolous Defect Lawsuits and Stimulate Production

WSHB Co-Founder Stephen Henning Steps Into the Spotlight at this Year's West Coast Casualty Seminar

Professional Liability Expert Weighs In On Protecting Your Practice From Opioid Doc Arrest Fallout

Penalties, Punitives, and Granny Cams: The Escalating Lure of Elder Abuse Litigation

Are Structured Settlements Still Relevant

Game Changing Trends Affecting Construction

He's Not My Guy: The Joint-Employer Doctrine

WSHB Case Update: DOL Proposes Increase to Minimum Salary Threshold

WSHB and DWF Announce Exclusive Association

WSHB Trial Alert: Jury Delivers Defense Verdict; Rejects $8.9 Million Demand

June 26, 2014

(Ventura, California).   A Ventura County jury returned a defense verdict in a nuisance and trespass case with multiple theories of liability which were fueling a whopping $8.9 million settlement demand.  WSHB trial lawyers Kevin Smith and Jason Gless reported the jury took little time to return the defense award in this three week trial.

The Plaintiffs in this action were the owners and farmers of an 82 acre lemon orchard in Santa Paula, California.  The defendant, Farmers Irrigation, is a non-profit corporation that has existed since 1917 and serves the local farmers with irrigation water.  The Plaintiffs purchased the property used for the orchard in 1997, and shortly thereafter planted the lemon orchard.  The Plaintiffs alleged that the soil at the lemon orchard was often saturated from excess water entering the property, and as a result, the lemon trees became stressed, causing them to produce either sub-standard fruit or die.  Plaintiffs claim that during the time period in question, they replaced over 5,000 lemon trees on the property, and lost significant resulting from reduced harvests.  Plaintiffs asserted that for many years they were aware of the saturated soil, but despite significant efforts to locate its source, Plaintiffs could not locate it until 2011 when they discovered an abandoned pipeline just north of their property.  Plaintiffs asserted that the abandoned pipeline belonged to Farmers Irrigation and that Farmers Irrigation was allowing water to escape from a neighboring weir box (water control device) and into the abandoned pipeline.  Plaintiffs asserted they disconnected and plugged the abandoned pipeline; after doing so, theyasserted their trees began to flush with growth.

By way of their Complaint, Plaintiffs sought damages in the form of lost income due to low fruit harvest, emotional distress and the replacement value of 5,020 trees, including treble damages for each tree pursuant to Civil Code Section 3346 and attorneys’ fees under C.C.P. Section 1021.9.  The Plaintiffs’ Complaint sought damages under the following seven causes of action:  Negligence, Negligence per se, Private Nuisance, Private Nuisance per se, Public Nuisance per se, Trespass and Trespass to Trees.  Prior to reaching the jury, the per se causes of action were dismissed by way of motion for non-suit.

Plaintiffs’ initial demand was $4.9 million.  However, as the case progressed, Plaintiffs’ damages continued and they raised their demand to $8.9 million.

The defense recognized Plaintiffs had a significant problem with oversaturation of their soil, but presented evidence that the problem was not the result of any wrongdoing of Farmers Irrigation.  Rather, the property in question had a perched water table several feet below ground, and as a result of Plaintiffs’ poor farming management and lack of maintenance to a tile drain system the water table rose and saturated the soil beneath the orchard.

Throughout the course of the litigation, and even during trial, Plaintiffs continued to change their theories of liability as the defense continued to point out the holes in their case.  After three weeks in trial, the jury took less than three hours to render a  defense verdict on the four remaining causes of action.



Privacy Policy      |      Site Map

© 2020 Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required