News & Insights

Recent Posts

WSHB's Constance Endelicato To Speak at ASHRM 2019 Annual Conference

Supreme Court Allows Suit Over Website Accessibility

Strategies for Defending Legionella and Mold Claims

Residential Revolution

Time Limit Demand Issues Arrive in North Carolina

WSHB Welcomes New Partner Julie A. Weerth to the Firm's New York Office

Temp Agency Absolved of Liability in Hotly Contested Action

Alternative Fee Agreements and Construction Issues: Oil and Water or Perfect Pairing!?

WSHB's Graham Miller Helps Demystify Construction Claims in the Pacific Northwest

WSHB Partner Janice Michaels Named to The Best Lawyers in America© 2020 List

One Bad Apple: Navigating through Sexual Battery and other Intentional Torts

Leading Construction Litigator Cynthia Tari Joins WSHB's Dallas Office

WSHB’s Philadelphia Partner Secures Summary Judgment in Catastrophic Premises Liability Matter

WSHB Welcomes New Partner Andrew Kessler

New Bill In New York Proposed for Signature by Governor Andrew Cuomo is Set To Make Employers "SWEAT"

Renowned Litigator Jason Williams Joins WSHB's Nevada Office

Litigator Richard Young Joins WSHB's Nevada Office

Published Appellate Opinion Upholding Summary Judgment in Favor of Commercial Tenant Against $3.5M Subrogation Suit

17 WSHB Lawyers Honored as 2019's Rising Stars

Arizona Supreme Court Allows Court of Appeals Decision Expanding Defendants' Ability to Enforce Settlements to Stand

WSHB’s Jason Klein Breaks Down the Good, the Sad and the Funny Sides of Claims

Litigating Sexual Battery and Other Intentional Torts: Navigating the One Bad Apple in Medical Negligence

WSHB Partner Michelle Arbitrio to Moderate Panel on Insurance and Risk Management in the Age of Mass Shootings

Girl on Fire: The Price of Pursuing the Truth in the #MeToo World

Pragmatic Issues on Settlement Versus Trial for Legal Malpractice Cases

WSHB Partner Jade Tran Named to Lawyers of Color's "Nation's Best" List

A Withering Assault

The Natural Progression of Natural Disasters

Nevada’s Governor Signs Chapter 40 Reform Bill

WA Condo Law Changes Hope to Curtail Frivolous Defect Lawsuits and Stimulate Production

WSHB Co-Founder Stephen Henning Steps Into the Spotlight at this Year's West Coast Casualty Seminar

Professional Liability Expert Weighs In On Protecting Your Practice From Opioid Doc Arrest Fallout

Penalties, Punitives, and Granny Cams: The Escalating Lure of Elder Abuse Litigation

Are Structured Settlements Still Relevant

Game Changing Trends Affecting Construction

He's Not My Guy: The Joint-Employer Doctrine

WSHB Case Update: DOL Proposes Increase to Minimum Salary Threshold

WSHB and DWF Announce Exclusive Association

WSHB Partner Nancy Quinn Koba Elected Supreme Court Justice for the Ninth District

WSHB Case Update: DOL Proposes Increase to Minimum Salary Threshold

March 22, 2019

Why This Proposal is Important

Employees in salaried positions earning under $35,308.00 annually will become newly-eligible for overtime pay if a new rule proposed by the U.S. Department of Labor is enacted. Employers with salaried positions under that amount should begin preparing to perform an audit of exemption classifications to ensure ongoing compliance in the event this rule is enacted.

The DOL Proposal

On March 7, 2019 the U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) proposed a new rule that would make an estimated 1.1 million American workers newly-eligible for overtime pay.

The Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) is a federal law which establishes, among other things, overtime pay eligibility. Within the authority granted by the FLSA, the DOL promulgates rules for determining which employees are “exempt” from, among other things, the overtime requirements.

The most common classes of employees who are considered exempt from overtime requirements under the FLSA are those who qualify for the executive exemption, the professional exemption, or the administrative exemption. These three exemptions are often referred to as the “white-collar” exemptions. While some of the criteria for the white-collar exemptions differ from one another, one requirement that all of the white-collar exemptions share is that the employee must earn at least $455.00 per week (equivalent to $23,660.00 per year), which amount was set by a DOL rule enacted in 2004.

In March 2019 the DOL proposed a new a rule which, if enacted, would raise the earnings threshold from $455.00 to $679.00 per week (equivalent to $35,308.00 annually). The newly-proposed rule would not modify the other criteria on which the determination is currently made regarding whether an employee otherwise qualifies for one of the white-collar exemptions (these additional criteria are included in the “job duties test”).

The Obama administration previously attempted to enact increases to the minimum earnings threshold, but that effort was halted by a Federal Court in Texas just before it was set to become effective in December 2016. One important distinction between the newly-proposed rule and the one that the Obama administration tried to enact relates to the issue of automatic increases. Where the Obama administration’s rule was set to increase the earnings threshold as a matter of course without additional action by the DOL, the newly-proposed rule merely contains a provision encouraging the DOL to revisit the earnings threshold every four years, with no requirement that increases occur.

Another important component of the newly-proposed rule is the modification to the definition of a “highly compensated individual.” Like those who qualify for one of the white-collar exemptions, highly compensated individuals are exempt from the overtime requirements of the FLSA. To qualify as a highly compensated individual, an employee need not meet all of the requirements of job duties test for the white-collar exemptions but must instead earn $100,000.00 or more annually. The newly-proposed rule would raise that earning threshold to $174,414.00.

The earning thresholds that are currently in place were set in 2004 at the 20th percentile of earnings for full-time, salaried workers in the lowest-wage census region. The amounts in the newly-proposed rule were calculated using the same methodology applied to 2017 census data. The Department of Labor anticipates slight changes to the final rule before enactment, updating the income thresholds with 2018 census data.

What This Means for Employers

Employers with salaried positions under $35,308.00 annually can expect to be affected by the new rule and should be prepared to adjust accordingly by considering the impact of reclassifying all employees earning less than $35,308.00 as non-exempt, including using a time clock for all hours worked, and eligibility for overtime pay and specific meal and rest periods. If enacted, the newly-proposed rule would take effect January 1, 2020.

The experienced team of employment attorneys at Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP have already begun assisting clients in understanding and preparing for compliance with this impending enactment. For more information, please contact Robert Hellner at (469) 210-2052 or at rhellner@wshblaw.com.

PRINT

Privacy Policy      |      Site Map

© 2019 Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required