News & Insights

Recent Posts

WSHB's Constance Endelicato To Speak at ASHRM 2019 Annual Conference

Supreme Court Allows Suit Over Website Accessibility

Strategies for Defending Legionella and Mold Claims

Residential Revolution

Time Limit Demand Issues Arrive in North Carolina

WSHB Welcomes New Partner Julie A. Weerth to the Firm's New York Office

Temp Agency Absolved of Liability in Hotly Contested Action

Alternative Fee Agreements and Construction Issues: Oil and Water or Perfect Pairing!?

WSHB's Graham Miller Helps Demystify Construction Claims in the Pacific Northwest

WSHB Partner Janice Michaels Named to The Best Lawyers in America© 2020 List

One Bad Apple: Navigating through Sexual Battery and other Intentional Torts

Leading Construction Litigator Cynthia Tari Joins WSHB's Dallas Office

WSHB’s Philadelphia Partner Secures Summary Judgment in Catastrophic Premises Liability Matter

WSHB Welcomes New Partner Andrew Kessler

New Bill In New York Proposed for Signature by Governor Andrew Cuomo is Set To Make Employers "SWEAT"

Renowned Litigator Jason Williams Joins WSHB's Nevada Office

Litigator Richard Young Joins WSHB's Nevada Office

Published Appellate Opinion Upholding Summary Judgment in Favor of Commercial Tenant Against $3.5M Subrogation Suit

17 WSHB Lawyers Honored as 2019's Rising Stars

Arizona Supreme Court Allows Court of Appeals Decision Expanding Defendants' Ability to Enforce Settlements to Stand

WSHB’s Jason Klein Breaks Down the Good, the Sad and the Funny Sides of Claims

Litigating Sexual Battery and Other Intentional Torts: Navigating the One Bad Apple in Medical Negligence

WSHB Partner Michelle Arbitrio to Moderate Panel on Insurance and Risk Management in the Age of Mass Shootings

Girl on Fire: The Price of Pursuing the Truth in the #MeToo World

Pragmatic Issues on Settlement Versus Trial for Legal Malpractice Cases

WSHB Partner Jade Tran Named to Lawyers of Color's "Nation's Best" List

A Withering Assault

The Natural Progression of Natural Disasters

Nevada’s Governor Signs Chapter 40 Reform Bill

WA Condo Law Changes Hope to Curtail Frivolous Defect Lawsuits and Stimulate Production

WSHB Co-Founder Stephen Henning Steps Into the Spotlight at this Year's West Coast Casualty Seminar

Professional Liability Expert Weighs In On Protecting Your Practice From Opioid Doc Arrest Fallout

Penalties, Punitives, and Granny Cams: The Escalating Lure of Elder Abuse Litigation

Are Structured Settlements Still Relevant

Game Changing Trends Affecting Construction

He's Not My Guy: The Joint-Employer Doctrine

WSHB Case Update: DOL Proposes Increase to Minimum Salary Threshold

WSHB and DWF Announce Exclusive Association

WSHB Partner Nancy Quinn Koba Elected Supreme Court Justice for the Ninth District

WSHB Case Update: Condominium Association, Inc. v. Adria Towers, L.L.C., et al.

September 30, 2016

On August 4, 2016, New Jersey’s highest court affirmed a ruling that consequential damages resulting from a subcontractor’s faulty work constituted “property damage” caused by an “occurrence” under the property developer/general contractor’s commercial general liability policies pursuant to ISO’s 1986 standard commercial general liability (“CGL”) form. Cypress Point Condo. Ass’n, Inc. v. Adria Towers, L.L.C., No. 076348, 2016 WL 4131662 (N.J. Aug. 4, 2016).

The New Jersey Supreme Court decision is significant for insurance carriers who write CGL policies for real estate developers and general contractors, as the case settled a previously open-ended question regarding the 1986 ISO standard CGL form, the most widely used CGL form today. Further, the decision nullifies the Third Circuit’s contrary opinion in Pennsylvania Nat. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co. v. Parkshore Dev. Corp., 403 F. App’x 770, 771 (3d Cir. 2010), which has been relied upon heavily by carriers to support coverage denials and reservations of rights. The Pennsylvania decision is no longer applicable, as it relied upon ISO’s 1973 standard CGL form (the “1973 ISO form”), whereas the policy form at issue in Cypress was the 1986 ISO CGL policy. In making its holding, the New Jersey Supreme Court in Cypress Point also distinguished two leading state cases on the issue of whether a standard CGL policy covers construction defects, Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc., 81 N.J. 233 (1979) and Firemen’s Insurance Co. of Newark v. National Union Fire Insurance Co., 387 N.J. Super. 434 (App. Div. 2006). The Weedo and Firemen’s cases were distinguished, as they also relied upon the older 1973 ISO form. The decision was motivated by the belief that the 1986 ISO sought to provide coverage for defective construction claims so long as the allegedly defective work had been performed by a subcontractor rather than the policyholder itself.

The precise issue before the Supreme Court was if rain water damage caused by a subcontractor’s faulty workmanship constituted property damage and an occurrence under the developer’s commercial general liability (CGL) insurance policy. This dispute arose from the construction of Cypress Point, a luxury condominium complex in Hoboken. Adria Towers, LLC, Metro Homes, LLC, and Commerce Construction Management, LLC served as the project’s developer and general contractor, and subcontractors carried out most of the work. Plaintiff, Cypress Point Condominium Association, brought suit for alleged faulty workmanship during construction, including roof leaks and water infiltration at the interior window jams and sills of the residential units. The Association claimed consequential damages, consisting of, among other things, damage to steel supports, exterior and interior sheathing and sheetrock, and other damage to insulation, common areas, and the residential units. During construction, the developer, Adria Towers, LLC, obtained four CGL policies from Evanston Insurance Company and Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company, (collectively, the “insurers”).

The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the insurers, dismissing the Association’s claims against the insurers. In a published decision, the Appellate Division reversed the trial court and held that, under the plain language of the CGL policies, the unintended and unexpected consequential damages caused by the subcontractors’ faulty workmanship constituted property damage and an occurrence. The Supreme Court agreed and affirmed, finding that the consequential damages caused by the subcontractors faulty workmanship constituted property damage. The matter was remanded to the trial court for proceedings consistent with the opinion.

The Supreme Court’s decision in Cypress is significant to carriers and policyholders alike, as New Jersey has joined the current majority of states holding that construction defects causing consequential damages give rise to an “occurrence” and “property damage” under the 1986 ISO CGL policy. Insurance carriers who write policies for subcontractors should be alerted to the potential for this exposure. Conversely, carriers writing policies for developers can take comfort in the clarity given by the ruling, which will enable them to more easily recoup damages from subcontractors whose faulty work results in consequential damages.

PRINT

Privacy Policy      |      Site Map

© 2019 Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required