News & Insights

Recent Posts

WSHB's Constance Endelicato To Speak at ASHRM 2019 Annual Conference

Supreme Court Allows Suit Over Website Accessibility

Strategies for Defending Legionella and Mold Claims

Residential Revolution

Time Limit Demand Issues Arrive in North Carolina

WSHB Welcomes New Partner Julie A. Weerth to the Firm's New York Office

Temp Agency Absolved of Liability in Hotly Contested Action

Alternative Fee Agreements and Construction Issues: Oil and Water or Perfect Pairing!?

WSHB's Graham Miller Helps Demystify Construction Claims in the Pacific Northwest

WSHB Partner Janice Michaels Named to The Best Lawyers in America© 2020 List

One Bad Apple: Navigating through Sexual Battery and other Intentional Torts

Leading Construction Litigator Cynthia Tari Joins WSHB's Dallas Office

WSHB’s Philadelphia Partner Secures Summary Judgment in Catastrophic Premises Liability Matter

WSHB Welcomes New Partner Andrew Kessler

New Bill In New York Proposed for Signature by Governor Andrew Cuomo is Set To Make Employers "SWEAT"

Renowned Litigator Jason Williams Joins WSHB's Nevada Office

Litigator Richard Young Joins WSHB's Nevada Office

Published Appellate Opinion Upholding Summary Judgment in Favor of Commercial Tenant Against $3.5M Subrogation Suit

17 WSHB Lawyers Honored as 2019's Rising Stars

Arizona Supreme Court Allows Court of Appeals Decision Expanding Defendants' Ability to Enforce Settlements to Stand

WSHB’s Jason Klein Breaks Down the Good, the Sad and the Funny Sides of Claims

Litigating Sexual Battery and Other Intentional Torts: Navigating the One Bad Apple in Medical Negligence

WSHB Partner Michelle Arbitrio to Moderate Panel on Insurance and Risk Management in the Age of Mass Shootings

Girl on Fire: The Price of Pursuing the Truth in the #MeToo World

Pragmatic Issues on Settlement Versus Trial for Legal Malpractice Cases

WSHB Partner Jade Tran Named to Lawyers of Color's "Nation's Best" List

A Withering Assault

The Natural Progression of Natural Disasters

Nevada’s Governor Signs Chapter 40 Reform Bill

WA Condo Law Changes Hope to Curtail Frivolous Defect Lawsuits and Stimulate Production

WSHB Co-Founder Stephen Henning Steps Into the Spotlight at this Year's West Coast Casualty Seminar

Professional Liability Expert Weighs In On Protecting Your Practice From Opioid Doc Arrest Fallout

Penalties, Punitives, and Granny Cams: The Escalating Lure of Elder Abuse Litigation

Are Structured Settlements Still Relevant

Game Changing Trends Affecting Construction

He's Not My Guy: The Joint-Employer Doctrine

WSHB Case Update: DOL Proposes Increase to Minimum Salary Threshold

WSHB and DWF Announce Exclusive Association

Los Angeles Jury Rejects $8.2 Million Demand in Living Mesothelioma Case

November 19, 2015

Los Angeles Jury Rejects $8.2 Million Demand Claim In Living Mesothelioma Case, Finds No Dangerous Condition Existed at LADWP Power Plant

In a closely watched case, a 12-person jury returned a complete defense verdict late Tuesday afternoon in favor of the City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (“LADWP”) after determining that its Scattergood Generating Station in El Segundo, California, did not present a dangerous condition, despite Plaintiff’s claim that he was exposed to asbestos dust from calcium silicate pipe insulation known as Kaylo 10. The case was granted trial preference in April and pushed to trial on an expedited schedule due to Plaintiff’s confirmed diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma and the possibility that he would not survive more than six months. WSHB attorneys Kevin D. Smith and Matthew P. Dickson led the legal team representing the LADWP in the two week trial.

In 1975, plaintiff Rainer Best visited Scattergood Generating Station to assist the LADWP with the removal of several blades from a low pressure steam turbine that had been manufactured by his employer, Brown Boveri Corporation. In order to open the turbine and access the blades, a large steam pipe and the turbine shells first had to be disconnected, which necessarily involved the handling of thermal insulation around several flanges and access points. Mr. Best claimed that this process took about a day and a half, during which time he was exposed to asbestos-containing dust generated by the removal of the insulation.

During trial, Mr. Best contended that some of the insulation he witnessed being removed was asbestos-containing Kaylo 10, even though the turbines were not installed until two years after Owens Corning removed amosite and chrysotile from its Kaylo brand pipe and block insulation. Plaintiff’s expert opined that the pipe insulation removal process could have generated an exposure between 5 to 40 fibers/cc, which was enough to be a substantial factor contributing to Mr. Best’s risk of developing cancer, even though he was a bystander for only a short period of time.

In response, the LADWP defense team established that it was highly unlikely asbestos-containing insulation had been used during original construction of the turbines, which was supported by a disputed specification issued by the boiler contractor, the testimony of several employees, and the former testimony of a union insulator that worked on the original construction in 1974. Additionally, the calcium silicate pipe and block insulation had been extensively tested over the years, and asbestos has never been detected in any of the samples.

In closing arguments, Plaintiff’s counsel requested a jury award of approximately $1.2 million in special damages and another $7 million in general damages. Ultimately, the jury found that Plaintiff failed to meet his burden of proof that the insulation products he saw removed over that day and a half in 1975 actually contained asbestos. As a result, the jury found that no dangerous condition existed and rendered a defense verdict in the LADWP’s favor. The LADWP will now be filing post-trial motions to recover costs.

 

PRINT

Privacy Policy      |      Site Map

© 2019 Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required