News & Insights

Recent Posts

WSHB Elevates Ten Partners to Defined Equity Status

Eleven WSHB Attorneys Elected Into Partnership

Eighteen Attorneys Elected to WSHB Senior Counsel

Supreme Court Allows Suit Over Website Accessibility

Strategies for Defending Legionella and Mold Claims

Residential Revolution

Time Limit Demand Issues Arrive in North Carolina

WSHB Welcomes New Partner Julie A. Weerth to the Firm's New York Office

Temp Agency Absolved of Liability in Hotly Contested Action

Alternative Fee Agreements and Construction Issues: Oil and Water or Perfect Pairing!?

WSHB's Graham Miller Helps Demystify Construction Claims in the Pacific Northwest

WSHB Partner Janice Michaels Named to The Best Lawyers in America© 2020 List

One Bad Apple: Navigating through Sexual Battery and other Intentional Torts

Leading Construction Litigator Cynthia Tari Joins WSHB's Dallas Office

WSHB’s Philadelphia Partner Secures Summary Judgment in Catastrophic Premises Liability Matter

WSHB Welcomes New Partner Andrew Kessler

New Bill In New York Proposed for Signature by Governor Andrew Cuomo is Set To Make Employers "SWEAT"

Renowned Litigator Jason Williams Joins WSHB's Nevada Office

Litigator Richard Young Joins WSHB's Nevada Office

Published Appellate Opinion Upholding Summary Judgment in Favor of Commercial Tenant Against $3.5M Subrogation Suit

17 WSHB Lawyers Honored as 2019's Rising Stars

Arizona Supreme Court Allows Court of Appeals Decision Expanding Defendants' Ability to Enforce Settlements to Stand

WSHB’s Jason Klein Breaks Down the Good, the Sad and the Funny Sides of Claims

Litigating Sexual Battery and Other Intentional Torts: Navigating the One Bad Apple in Medical Negligence

WSHB Partner Michelle Arbitrio to Moderate Panel on Insurance and Risk Management in the Age of Mass Shootings

Girl on Fire: The Price of Pursuing the Truth in the #MeToo World

Pragmatic Issues on Settlement Versus Trial for Legal Malpractice Cases

WSHB Partner Jade Tran Named to Lawyers of Color's "Nation's Best" List

A Withering Assault

The Natural Progression of Natural Disasters

Nevada’s Governor Signs Chapter 40 Reform Bill

WA Condo Law Changes Hope to Curtail Frivolous Defect Lawsuits and Stimulate Production

WSHB Co-Founder Stephen Henning Steps Into the Spotlight at this Year's West Coast Casualty Seminar

Professional Liability Expert Weighs In On Protecting Your Practice From Opioid Doc Arrest Fallout

Penalties, Punitives, and Granny Cams: The Escalating Lure of Elder Abuse Litigation

Are Structured Settlements Still Relevant

Game Changing Trends Affecting Construction

He's Not My Guy: The Joint-Employer Doctrine

WSHB Case Update: DOL Proposes Increase to Minimum Salary Threshold

WSHB and DWF Announce Exclusive Association

WSHB Client Alert: Meser v. Bound Brook Board of Education

Arizona Arbitrator Returns Full Defense Award in Construction Defect Arbitration of 15 Single Family Homes

March 28, 2016

Following a two week arbitration in Maricopa County, Arizona, attorneys Jill Ann Herman and Greg Amundson successfully defended all claims sought by the owners of fifteen (15) single family homes in favor of the selling entity of an Arizona residential developer and general contractor. Specifically, the Arbitrator issued a decision which completely exonerated the seller from any liability for all of the claims.

In the case, Claimants alleged that numerous design and construction defects existed at each of the homes, from sulfate attack on foundations, concrete and masonry walls to deficient framing and roofs, with numerous interior and exterior defects in between. The Claimants’ original cost of repair totaled $742,652; by closing argument, the Claimants’ cost of repair was down to $372,111.

Prior to arbitration, the Arbitrator denied summary judgment motions on legal standing and “As-Is” disclosures based on triable issues of fact, and also denied leave to amend to name the developer and general contractor as a respondent based on the statute of repose. Based on the evidence at arbitration, the Arbitrator found that Respondent was not the developer or general contractor of the community and Claimants’ homes, and it was not the alter ego of the developer, despite a similarity in names, officers, directors and corporate logo. Accordingly, the Arbitrator determined that Respondent was the prevailing party on causes of action for breach of contract and breach of implied warranty of workmanship and habitability based on the facts, as well as affirmative defenses including legal standing, “As-Is” disclosure, and the statute of repose.

The Respondent will be seeking its attorney’s fees and costs following this binding arbitration.


Privacy Policy      |      Site Map

© 2020 Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required